Ten Fingers, 6 Strings: No More

July 07, 2005

No More

capt.sge.kdr46.070705231106.photo03.photo.default-380x253.jpg

See that stuff on the wall. It shouldn't need much explanation, but it is blood. Human blood. Innocent people going to work blood.

We've been seeing a myriad of these scenes since 9-11. We've seen the blood of the innocent cover the buildings and streets of New York, Kabul, Bagdad, Fallujah, Mosul, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Islamabad, Bali, Madrid and now London. During this time, the Left has constistently made "arguments" that the real villian in all this is us. The refrain goes like this: the murderous monsters who did this just can't help themselves, and we provoke them with our shiny watches, our McDonald's french fries and democracy spreading, so we are the ones to blame.

Well you people can officially eat the excretion coming from the business end of rabid baboon. Yeah, that means you George Galloway and your ilk, like Mr. Kos. I am no longer in the service to argue or dialog with you people on any level. I'm not only questioning your patriotism, I'm downright questioning your humanity.

Look at that picture above and tell us again who it is that is responsible for this. Tell us who is wrong. Then let those of us who still have some level of humanity left determine this one.

Posted by 10 fingers 6 strings at July 7, 2005 05:04 PM | TrackBack

Comments

Mate, thanks for your support at this terrible time. Things are already getting back to normal here, so whatever the pondlife that did this is trying to achieve, they've failed.

Current reports suggest that it may not be the work of suicide bombers; there are witness reports of a man leaving a bag on the bus. If that's true, and he didn't even have the guts to take himself out, my outrage is quadrupled.

As we've previously discussed, one of the most frustrating things for me about attacks by Al-Qaeda supporters is the lack of a clear aim, agenda or manifesto.

At least with the IRA, we knew the motives behind the bombings - an Ireland entirely independent of British control. With these guys (and it's a struggle to use that word, with its implication of a level of humanity), there's no such clarity.

If the net-posted claim of responsibility is to be believed, the attack purports to be in revenge for the British presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, whilst I strongly disagreed with the 2003 invasion, the only reason we're still there is to protect the fledgling administration. We can't get out quick enough. And when we do, what do they think will happen?
Whatever political parties these people (same caveat) support, the coalition forces are not keeping them out of power - Iraq is a democracy now. If the Iraqi people don't want to be ruled by the politicians that the insurgents support, then it won't happen - end of story. Forcing out the coalition troops now, as opposed to when the Iraqi administration asks us to leave, won't help their political aims at all if these aims are not supported by the Iraqis.

My suspicion is that the motives of the bombers are more amorphous (e.g. anti-Western, anti-capitalist), and this makes me madder still. They probably couldn't compile a rational list of aims if you gave them paper, a pen, and a week to think about it. How dare you execute these outrages when you don't even know what you're trying to achieve. You make the IRA look positively intellectual. Either urinate or get off the political pot.

Or is it that, by publishing a manifesto, they risk finding out that 99.9% of Muslims don't agree with a word of it?

Keep up the good work TF6S. We're not always of the same political viewpoint, but on this there can be no polarity. Nothing justifies the carnage we saw here yesterday.

Posted by: Jon Bartley at July 8, 2005 06:20 AM