![]() September 14, 2005Goldstein = SantiagoYesterday, the Colossus pondered whether we should rally around a symbol, or a hero, in our fight against Islamic extremism (like Santiago Matamoros in the Spanish fight against the Moors). This is a bit of non-sequitur, but I have a nominee: Jeff Goldstein. Jeff Goldstein has been a rhetorical thunderstorm, striking hyperbolic lightening rods held by the media during the Katrina aftermath. He's been relentless at poking holes in the memes, lazy arguments and partisan posturing that has been passed off as axiomatic in the debate over the responses to the disaster. Today, he hits it out of the yard. I hate to "Amen" without any critical thought, but Jeff takes out Andrew Sullivan in doing so. My hand is forced. Let's just go to the clip: All of which brings me to the point: pace Sullivan, et al., it is my contention that the hyperbolic and emotionally-charged coverage of Katrina is responsible for amplifying problems with the federal response, problems that are not nearly so severe as partisans looking to score political points (and having taken their cues from faulty, myopic, and uninformed reportage) make them out to be. Cleanup and rescue is proceeding much quicker than expected; like relief and rescue workers, the Army Corp of Engineers has overcome tremendous obstacles to fix the several levee breaches, using the kind of improvised ingenuity that is their hallmark; the death toll is far below the original estimates; and so on. Someone pass this man a cigar. Seriously. Posted by 10 fingers 6 strings at September 14, 2005 12:41 PM | TrackBackComments
A man can learn a lot reading Goldstein. I've been reading him since last fall, and I have to say, there isn't a single blogger out there who is as skilled at the medium as he is. He is a master of the form -- and it is a form. I can say that although the Llamas are my best friends in the blogosphere, reading him has taught me more about blogging than anyone else I've read. He combines a sharp, sharp intellect with a deep knowledge of philosophy. He is very well read, and has a remarkable gift for understanding arguments from the left -- he can answer the most arcane argument from the grove of academe with skill. But I read him most of all because he is funny. Really, really funny. I don't always agree with him, but I respect the hell out of him and his abilities. And I'm also smart enough not to tangle with him -- he's a great ally, and a fearsome foe. Posted by: The Colossus at September 14, 2005 01:32 PM5th column Posted by: jeff at September 15, 2005 09:21 AMPost a comment
![]() |
Search
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
AllahPundit Andúnië American Digest Beautiful Atrocities The Belgravia Dispatch The Belmont Club Captain's Quarters the dissident frogman Tim Blair EURSOC from the still InstaPundit LILEKS (James) :: the Bleat little green footballs The Mudville Gazette protein wisdom Right Side of the Rainbow Roger L. Simon A Small Victory Michael J. Totten Transterrestrial Musings USS Clueless Vodkapundit Winds of Change
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004
Recent Entries
Continous Wonder Ramping Up
It Has Begun Thank You Spray Continuous Wonder Jack Army Back From Iraq Introducing Freddy Update on the New Site Stuff
|