October 18, 2005

"Wolf! um...wolf?"

Reading through the news after the successful election in Iraq gave me strange sense of deja vu. Here are two of the major stories out of Iraq after the election:

Allegations of Fraud in Iraqi Election

Iraq's election commission announced Monday that officials were investigating "unusually high" numbers of "yes" votes in about a dozen provinces during Iraq's landmark referendum on a new constitution, raising questions about irregularities in the balloting.

Word of the review came as Sunni Arab leaders repeated accusations of fraud after initial reports from the provinces suggested the constitution had passed. Among the Sunni allegations are that police took ballot boxes from heavily "no" districts, and that some "yes" areas had more votes than registered voters.

...and from the LA Times:

U.S. Killed Civilians in Airstrike, Iraqis Say

American fighter jets and attack helicopters killed about 20 Iraqi civilians and injured 15 other people, including women and children, during an anti-insurgent operation in the western city of Ramadi, local police and a doctor who treated the wounded said Monday.

The city, 60 miles west of Baghdad, has been the site of a major U.S. offensive, and fighting escalated four days ago, residents said. On Saturday, five U.S. soldiers died in Ramadi when a roadside bomb exploded near their vehicle. U.S. forces said they launched three airstrikes in the area Sunday, killing 70 suspected insurgents.

Let's put this in journalistic context. Here was the report just after the 2004 election in Afghanistan which elected Karzai President:

Hamid Karzai has won Afghanistan's landmark presidential election, a spokesman for its electoral board said Wednesday, after investigators concluded that fraud and technical errors were too minor to overturn his triumph.

A formal announcement declaring Karzai the winner of a five-year term as the country's first directly elected leader was expected later Wednesday.

There were allegations of fraud immediately after the Afghan election and Karzai's opponents boycotted the results. Shortly after, it was found that the abnormalities were minor. Unfortunately, even in moderm countries, elections aren't exactly a zero defects event, regardless of intention.

Next, here were some accusations against the U.S. military in a strike back in 2004 as well:

The US military has denied allegations that its forces in Iraq killed dozens of people celebrating a marriage in the west of the country. Initial reports suggested that a wedding party near the Syrian border was the target of a US air strike.

A US military spokesman confirmed that about 40 people had been killed in the area - but said US forces had targeted a safe house used by foreign fighters.

He said coalition forces had retaliated after coming under attack.

The incident occurred late on Tuesday at the village of Makr al-Deeb, near the border town of Qaim.

The BBC quoted a "source":

They [Americans] hit two homes where the wedding was being held and then they levelled the whole village. - Iraqi Witness

As we know now, the border town of Qaim, and the region around it, where flooded with terrorists using the Euphrates to supply the insurgency into the heart of Iraq. As U.S. assets attacked, unnamed "Iraqi witnesses" were quick to find reporters to tell them what they "saw." Other than giving the BBC, NY Times and Democratic Underground some more cannon fodder for their "U.S. = Nazi" meme, the reports were largely unsubstatiated and, after months of fighting in Western Iraq, it is highly likely the the BBC, NY Times and DU were all, as Vladimir Lenin might say, "useful idiots."

Keep these stories in perspective as you read the news coming out of Iraq after the election. I'm not conclusively saying that there isn't fraud in Iraqi elections or that civilians weren't killed in a U.S. bombing raid, however, I would take the accusations more seriously if the U.S. wasn't immediately presumed guilty before all the facts are in.

How many times does the media have to cry wolf before we all start turning our heads?

Posted by 10 fingers 6 strings at October 18, 2005 08:26 AM | TrackBack
Comments

No, see, we must be zero defects at all times.

Never mind that in Saddam's last election, voters were herded to the ballot box with whips; we can overlook minor irregularities like that from the developing world.

No, if one person even felt disenfranchised by a long line or a person is ever killed by accident, then we must scourge ourselves and wear the eternal hairshirt before the altar of the UN, begging forgiveness.

Never mind that stories like this whip up all the crazies who are trying to kill our soldiers. No need for the press to be careful when it's just American lives at stake.

Posted by: The Colossus at October 18, 2005 09:25 AM

Yes, afterall, we should be held to higher standards than those darky savages...I mean, aren't we the civilized ones?

Posted by: TF6S at October 18, 2005 09:33 AM

I was thinking this morning on my 1.5 hour long commute to work about this topic of the MSM and their negativity about virtually everything. I think it is clearly a phenomenon that was not present during the previous liberal administration of Bill Clinton. It seems like everything possibly negative going on in the world and at home that could in any way shape or form be linked, tied, compared to, considered to be a part of, related to, or demonstrably a result of the Bush administration is constantly drumbeaten into the public from any possible outlet the MSM (what a day it will be when they are not the MSM) has at their disposal.

Does anyone remember constant media reports of civilian death tolls in Bosnia when we were over there dropping bombs? Or the ineptness of the Clinton administration over the FEMA response to Andrew in 1992? It took them longer to respond to that than it did for FEMA to respond to Katrina.

Anyway, I'm tired of beating this old horse of the bias of the MSM, cause that fact is about as well established as yellow and blue make green. But what concerns me is this constant focus on the negative. TF6S makes an outstanding point about how these stories result in more deaths of our troops because it inflames more hatred. But what else does it result in...let's say, when we are bombarded with images of poor black people screaming for help everyday for a month on the news with accompanying stories of how the Bush Admin is racist, failing the poor, caused the storm by their environmental policies (I love that one by the way) it breeds hatred here as well.

Not to mention I think Bush has taken his focus off of what should be priorities like conservative reforms he promised in the last election to go build habitat for humanity houses in Louisiana. While not a bad thing, and a good image of our President to be seen by people, I think he has had to go overboard with responding to the hurricane because the media blaringly portrayed what was happening in Louisiana for days (untruths by the way) lambasting Bush for it all. Anyway, I just want our President to go back to promoting his conservative agenda and to getting more European support for the war in Iraq...just kidding, was wondering if anyone was still reading this. No, I want our troops to start coming home and for Iraqis to take over there and defend themselves. If they are ready.

I saw your comment about on to Syria and after this Iraq pickle we've been in for years now, I'm not sure I would want us to follow this same course again. It has cost way too much money and too many lives for what possibly will end up being an Islamic regime anyway. I'm so glad they voted on their constitution and Democracy is beginning in this area of the world, I just hope that it would be a real Democracy and not a Islamic theocracy with limited rights for women and continued hatred for the West and Christians.

But, unlike the MSM, I do see that this is a great time for the world to be celebrating the end of a brutal dictatorship and the birth of perhaps a real Democracy in the Middle East.

And now roll the clip of all the people and Ewoks celebrating at the end of Return of the Jedi.

Posted by: rickhamman at October 18, 2005 10:19 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?




Please enter the numeric code you see below:





Search
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Entries