March 21, 2006

Trying to Take Heart

I've been taking a nice break from blogging, especially about any issues of substance for a little while. There are a lot of things happening in real life that are secondary reasons for these lapses, however, mostly it stems from me trying to get my mind around what is happening to our civilization in the midst of War that it has never fought before.

I guess with a challenge like that, it isn't too much of a stretch to indentify the culprit keeping me awake all night.

The anniversary of the invasion of Iraq gave the opponents of the war the opportunity to jump up and down about the complete mismanagement and debacle of the occupation period. It has become commonplace, particularly in the media, to openly question the President on which cabinet members must be held responsible for these pre-established blunders. While the Washington press corp waxes outrageous, and the rest of the country losing hope fast, there are hundreds of thousands of mostly Americans and Iraqis, combined with a smattering of Brits, Aussies, Poles and others who are fighting for a free society in the midst of one of most backward societies on earth.

Truth be told, I've been losing heart. My faith does not waver towards those that are executing the war, towards the 200,000 Iraqis who have signed up to shed blood to fight for their country, towards the millions that voted to participate in a federal government backed by a constitution and towards the handful of those determined to bring us the truth on the ground through our defeatist media filter. My faith is waning from the American people who I thought were able to hold just enough of us together to fight off the predominantly Leftist onslaught that began on September 12, 2001. If we pull out and lose in Iraq, history will not point towards Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, it will point straight towards the combination of those who didn't have the stomach or the smarts to see through the transparent perfidity engaged by those who aren't in reality anti-war, they are on the side of those that want to kill us.

Notice how the defeatest meme has shifted its focus from the insurgency towards the "imminent" civil war. They completely ignored the United States led effort that trained a homegrown, fully capable fighting force to conduct clear and hold operations in a region that even Saddam Hussein was unable to contain--one that resulted in Sunni Iraqis actually turning to fight against the blood-thirsty members of al-Qaeda. Currently, al-Qaeda is as popular in Iraq as David Duke at Wu Tang Clan concert.

This should be HUGE news, but almost zero attention has been paid to this fact and I think a heavy portion of the fault lies with the Bush Administration for not trumpeting these successes earlier. If anything is constant, it is the anti-war panderings towards any shred of random events they can use to further their meme (for example for an entire year Ayad Allawi was nothing but a puppet of the Bush Administration; then the moment he says something that falls in line with their civil war meme, he's a hero speaking "truth to power"). Bush should know better and kill the snake in its hole.

As far as civil war goes, Iraqis have been in a state of unrest for years. Our entrance into existing this unrest didn't just start 3 years ago, but when we intervened in Desert Storm 15 years ago. The shift from Sunni to Shiite power shifted, and militias and death squads have been nothing new since Saddam's overthrow. In light of this factionalism, the major players within Iraq continue to engage in an admittedly tense, but federal political process--and that includes even the radical fringe elements such as al-Sadr.

As an aside, reading reports of Shiite opinion in Western publications and you'd get the picture that al-Sadr guy has the entire Shiite population at his beck and call. While I find even the small amount of support he gets gravely disturbing considering his Iranian connections, let's keep it in perspective. When he rose up against the Americans in Najaf, he was quickly put down not only by the 11th MEF and the 1st Calvary Division, but also by the citizens of Najaf that saw him as nothing more than a opportunistic punk. His vaunted "Mehdi Army" was dodging bullets from every direction and he eventually negotiated a truce.

The potential civil war in Iraq is still a real possibility. However, the Americans and the Iraqis had to deal with defeating the insurgency first. This has largely succeeded in light of attacks that, although still very bloody, have not been able to affect any long-term strategic goals.

If we hold on, we can win this one. Iraq is holding together despite all odds.

But, the Left sees blood. Not the blood dripping from the mouths of the Iraqis and those fighting for a free society, but blood from the man they would do anything to humiliate: George Bush. I sometimes long for a Lincoln, a Reagan, or a Roosevelt to be at the helm during these times, however in the end I know that despite his inadequacies, he still understands the stakes of this war. The Left would be wise right now to not confuse disapproval with mass approval for their memes. I'm in the disapproval of the President camp right now, but it'll be a cold day in hell before I put a vote forward towards a party that wants to pull us out to settle a cheap political score.

I'm afraid the consequences are too dire if we lose this one, and although we are still very much in position to win this, I'm not sure the decadent West has the chin to see it through.

Posted by 10 fingers 6 strings at March 21, 2006 07:14 PM | TrackBack
Comments

"My faith is waning from the American people who I thought were able to hold just enough of us together to fight off the predominantly Leftist onslaught that began on September 12, 2001."
I understand your sentiment. But the current war on terrorism needs to be kept in perspective, from a historical and social point of view.
For one thing, there have been worse times in our history. The Civil War, for example. Just imagine how Lincoln felt after years of military defeats, with the Copperheads and Democrats clamoring for peace at any cost. And if you want another example of how divided our country can become in wartime, read up on the War of 1812. We survived those difficult times.
At the risk of being labeled ethnocentric, I will tell you unequivocally that in my opinion we live in the greatest country in the world. I have traveled around the world and defy anyone to point to any other country which enjoys the freedoms, opportunities, and liberty that we have here. Immigrants have been banging down the door to get into this country for our entire history, and now they even come across the borders illegally to be here. There is a reason for that. While being far from perfect, our country represents the best there is.
Where else do in the world do citizens hold an "inalienable" right to their freedoms which does not stem from from some government authority which can rescend those rights? As a second generation American, I value this unique aspect of our democracy very highly.
One of our founding fathers observed that freedom is something that every generation needs to defend, or it will disappear. To me, that is an eternal truth that is in jeopardy right now. In my lifetime, we have grown a generation that lacks patience, requires instant gratification,and refuses to admit that all actions have both positive and negative consequences. We often tend to see the glass as half-empty, rather than half-full.
And everything is about politics today. The desire to wield political power transcends everything else -national security, education, social programs, everything. It's kind of pathetic in a way.
On an individual level, I believe that it is part of human nature to take what is given to you, at no cost, for granted. That includes liberty, freedom and the other rights which accrue to citizens of this country. I believe people tend to value that which they have earned or sacrificed for more than that which is handed to them. We have many people in this country who fall into this category.
And about the War on Terrorism - it is as crucial a war as any we have fought in our entire history. My parents had WW II, my generation had the Cold War and it's threat of nuclear annilihation and now our children face the spectre of global terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. Close your eyes for a moment and just imagine the kind of world our grandchildren will be living in should global terrorism prevail. It is unthinkable.
Lastly, take a moment and consider the impact of losing heart on our military personnel. They are in the crucible every day, committed to making the sacrifices necessary to prevent evil from prevailing. They need our support. As a veteran of 23 years service which started during Viet Nam, I have seen first hand how we can prevail on a battlefield and still lose a conflict because the lack of a national will.
My opinion is that the lack of a national will in the War on Terror will have much more serious and profound consequences than those of losing in Viet Nam.
It's tough to stay focused on a subject as draining as war. Each of us has to decide how much of our personal self we want to invest in the subject. It is much too important to forget.
Thanks for the opportunity to spout off on a personal level.

Posted by: R,A, Allen at March 22, 2006 03:06 AM

Me, when I'm feeling blue about the war, I try to concentrate on small things. For me, it's been drinking wine, refitting a fishtank, writing a Spy Novel, and taking a vacation.

I've also been having trouble following the narrative of the thread of current events; but after some thought, this whole Iraq Civil War meme actually pleases me -- it means that the insurgents have completely abandoned the notion of defeating us, and the press has therefore had to invent a new bogeyman.

I'm also thinking that the Iraqi political impasse will be resolved soon, and there will be a President and a PM there shortly -- in which case the press will have to move on to other things, lacking the ability to reflect on the fact that they were wrong once more. Events might disappoint me, but I think it's likely.

Bush's poll numbers, now, mean nothing -- it's the poll numbers in October and November that matter. He'll get his act together politically. He always does.

And reflect that no matter how bad things seem right now, the Republicans have not one candidate, but two, who could beat Hillary Clinton in '08 -- Rudy Giuliani and John McCain. If Bush's political fortunes hit rock bottom, those two guys both have enough distance from him to get elected, while still carrying on with the war. And even if the Dems retake the House is '06, and manage somehow to get an article of impeachment passed, what are the chances of them getting 2/3rds of the Senate to agree? Slim and none. More likely they'll overreach. And even if they do force Bush out, who becomes president? Cheney.

Take heart. All will come out right in the end.

Posted by: The Colossus at March 22, 2006 07:55 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?




Please enter the numeric code you see below:





Search
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Entries