![]() May 24, 2006Demand Term Limits for Congress NowMore on this later, as I'm really busy today, but as an average citizen of this great country of ours, I am fairly convinced that Congress, as a collective, does not represent me, and I'm get the feeling, a lot of other Americans. I'm absolutely furious over this unanimous, bi-partisan demand for the FBI to return the documents and evidence gathered in what seems to be a lawful search and seizure. Professory Glenn Reynolds explains: I say, search 'em all. Now. They must have something to hide, right? They certainly don't mind much more intrusive paramilitary raids on the rest of us, even though the Fourth Amendment provides a lot more reason to doubt the validity of those than the Speech and Debate Clause provides where Congressional searches are concerned. This isn't about ideological differences, this is about corruption. I'm not calling for a "vote for the other guy" campaign, as that is just a call to jump onto the other pirate ship. What I am advocating is a mass movement by the people of this country to demand term limits for Congress. This is the ONLY way we are going to solve getting the career politicians out of Washington. This is the ONLY way we are going to get some control over spending. Also, this is a potential political disaster. If they find Representative Jefferson guilty, Congress is going to look really stupid and, even worse, an apologist for dubious behavior. After all, Jefferson is being investigated for taking some enormous bribes. Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. What are you thoughts on term limits? If you are for them, how could it possibly be implemented when it is clear that Congress sure isn't going to pass it? Posted by 10 fingers 6 strings at May 24, 2006 02:20 PMComments
The Congress seems to be saying that they are, like diplomats or Roman tribunes, immune, inviolable, and above the law. Screw that. If you have a warrant and are pursuing a criminal investigation, you get to search the guy's office. I can't even believe this is being debated. Posted by: The Colossus at May 24, 2006 03:59 PMRe: term limits. Two terms for Senators, 6 for House Members (in other words, 12 years in total). That would be in a lifetime -- not consecutive, so there would be none of this "serve 12 years, sit out a term, serve 12 more" nonsense. I'd be for it. Posted by: The Colossus at May 24, 2006 04:03 PMI have thought for quite some time that we need term limits in congress. Every time I see Ted Kennedy's fat face on TV I think that. But with the latest antics by what I thought was a party that represented me I am even more convinced we need them. The power is not in the people's hands as it should be because the mentality is not one of service to their constituency, it is as if they are in a corporation trying to become the fattest cat at the top. I think 12 years is far too long. One term for Senators, 2 for house. 12 years can give them too much time to worry about their "legacy" and plenty of time to get in good with the power players to start doling out favors and positioning themselves for a cush job after. Six years wouldn't entirely eliminate that, but it might be viewed more as a position of service to the nation rather than a springboard to power. But, as much of an awesome idea that it is, sadly I know and we all know it will never come to pass. Posted by: Rick at May 24, 2006 08:23 PMSeems like we are all in the same spirit. However, regardless of the actual term-limit threshold, how would one go about getting it into law when we are trying to reign in the ones making the law? There has to be a way to make this happen. I am in creative mode now knowing that we are stuck with way too many corrupt bureaucrats in Congress. I think if you take gerrymandering into consideration, term-limits would solve a crap-load of problems with our legislature. Posted by: TF6S at May 25, 2006 05:20 PMI would 100 percent support term limits on Congress and believe this idea is so overdue it's suprising the American people haven't gotten to that point with all the scandals, corruption, special interest ties and pork that is involved with politically invulnerable incumbents. Posted by: C.S. Scott at May 30, 2006 02:59 PMPost a comment
![]() |
Search
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
AllahPundit Andúnië American Digest Beautiful Atrocities The Belgravia Dispatch The Belmont Club Captain's Quarters the dissident frogman Tim Blair EURSOC from the still InstaPundit LILEKS (James) :: the Bleat little green footballs The Mudville Gazette protein wisdom Right Side of the Rainbow Roger L. Simon A Small Victory Michael J. Totten Transterrestrial Musings USS Clueless Vodkapundit Winds of Change
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004
Recent Entries
Continous Wonder Ramping Up
It Has Begun Thank You Spray Continuous Wonder Jack Army Back From Iraq Introducing Freddy Update on the New Site Stuff
|